The extension of a particle’s wave functions into the classically forbidden region is an important difference between classical and quantum physics. Let’s take a closer look at the wave function in the region of Figure 40.13a. The potential energy in the classically forbidden region is thus the Schrödinger equation for is
We’re assuming a confined particle, with less than , so is negative. It will be useful to reverse the order of the two energies and write
where
is a positive constant. As a homework problem, you can show that the units of are meters.
The Schrödinger equation of Equation 40.34 is one we can solve by guessing. We simply need to think of two functions whose second derivatives are a positive constant times the functions themselves. Two such functions, as you can quickly confirm, are and . Thus, according to Equation 40.8, the general solution of the Schrödinger equation for is
One requirement of the wave function is that as . The function diverges as , so the only way to satisfy this requirement is to set . Thus
This is an exponentially decaying function. Notice that all the wave functions in Figure 40.14a look like exponential decays for .
The wave function must also be continuous. Suppose the oscillating wave function within the potential well has the value when it reaches the classical boundary at . To be continuous, the wave function of Equation 40.37 has to match this value at . That is,
This boundary condition at is sufficient to determine that the constant is
If we use the Equation 40.39 result for in Equation 40.37, we find that the wave function in the classically forbidden region of a finite potential well is
In other words, the wave function oscillates until it reaches the classical turning point at then it decays exponentially within the classically forbidden region. A similar analysis could be done for .
FIGURE 40.15 shows the wave function in the classically forbidden region. You can see that the wave function at has decreased to
Although an exponential decay does not have a sharp ending point, the parameter measures “about how far” the wave function extends past the classical turning point before the probability of finding the particle has decreased nearly to zero. This distance is called the penetration distance:
A classical particle reverses direction at the turning point. But atomic particles are not classical. Because of wave–particle duality, an atomic particle is “fuzzy” with no well-defined edge. Thus an atomic particle can spread a distance of roughly into the classically forbidden region.
The penetration distance is unimaginably small for any macroscopic mass, but it can be significant for atomic particles. Notice that the penetration distance depends inversely on the quantity , the distance of the energy level below the top of the potential well. You can see in Figure 40.14a that is much larger for the state, near the top of the potential well, than for the state.
NOTE In making use of Equation 40.41, you must use SI units of for and J for the energies. The penetration distance is then in meters.
An electron is confined in a 2.0-nm-wide region with a potential-energy depth of 1.00 eV. What are the penetration distances into the classically forbidden region for an electron in the and states?
MODEL The electron is in the finite potential well whose energies and wave functions were shown in Figure 40.14a.
SOLVE The ground state has . Similarly, in the state. We can use Equation 40.41 to calculate
REVIEW These values are consistent with Figure 40.14a.