38.6.1 The Stationary States of the Hydrogen Atom

FIGURE 38.17 shows a Rutherford hydrogen atom, with a single electron orbiting a nucleus that consists of a single proton. We will assume a circular orbit of radius r and speed v. We will also assume, to keep the analysis manageable, that the proton remains stationary while the electron revolves around it. This is a reasonable assumption because the proton is roughly 1800 times as massive as the electron. With these assumptions, the atom’s energy is the kinetic energy of the electron plus the potential energy of the electron-proton interaction. This is

E=K+U=12mv2+14πϵ0qelecqprotonr=12mv2−e24πϵ0r (38.22)

where we used qelec=−e and qproton=+e.

FIGURE 38.17 A Rutherford hydrogen atom. The size of the nucleus is greatly exaggerated.

The figure illustrates the Rutherford atom with a proton at the center and a single electron orbiting the proton in a circular path.
FIGURE 38.17 Full Alternative Text

NOTE   m is the mass of the electron, not the mass of the entire atom.

Now, the electron, as we are coming to understand it, has both particle-like and wave-like properties. First, let us treat the electron as a charged particle. The proton exerts a Coulomb electric force on the electron:

F⃗elec=(14πϵ0 e2r2 , toward center) (38.23)

This force gives the electron an acceleration a⃗elec=F⃗elec/m that also points to the center. This is a centripetal acceleration, causing the particle to move in its circular orbit. The centripetal acceleration of a particle moving in a circle of radius r at speed v must be v2/r, thus

aelec=Felecm=e24πϵ0mr2=v2r (38.24)

Rearranging, we find

v2=e24πϵ0mr (38.25)

Equation 38.25 is a constraint on the motion. The speed v and radius r must satisfy Equation 38.25 if the electron is to move in a circular orbit. This constraint is not unique to atoms; we earlier found a similar relationship between v and r for orbiting satellites.

Now let’s treat the electron as a de Broglie wave. In Section 38.4 we found that a particle confined to a one-dimensional box sets up a standing wave as it reflects back and forth. A standing wave, you will recall, consists of two traveling waves moving in opposite directions. When the round-trip distance in the box is equal to an integer number of wavelengths (2L=nλ), the two oppositely traveling waves interfere constructively to set up the standing wave.

Suppose that, instead of traveling back and forth along a line, our wave-like particle travels around the circumference of a circle. The particle will set up a standing wave, just like the particle in the box, if there are waves traveling in both directions and if the round-trip distance is an integer number of wavelengths. This is the idea we want to carry over from the particle in a box. As an example, FIGURE 38.18 shows a standing wave around a circle with n=10 wavelengths.

FIGURE 38.18 An n=10 electron standing wave around the orbit’s circumference.

The figure illustrates a proton at the center of a classical orbit with an electron standing wave around the proton on a classical orbit.

The mathematical condition for a circular standing wave is found by replacing the round-trip distance 2L in a box with the round-trip distance 2πr on a circle. Thus a circular standing wave will occur when

2πr=nλ  n=1, 2, 3, … (38.26)

But the de Broglie wavelength for a particle has to be λ=h/p=h/mv. Thus the standing-wave condition for a de Broglie wave is

2πr=nhmv

This condition is true only if the electron’s speed is

vn=nh2πmr  n=1, 2, 3, … (38.27)

The quantity h/2π occurs so often in quantum physics that it is customary to give it a special name. We define the quantity ℏ, pronounced “h bar,” as

ℏ≡h2π=1.055×10−34 J s=6.58×10−16eV s

With this definition, we can write Equation 38.27 as

vn=nℏmr  n=1, 2, 3, … (38.28)

This, like Equation 38.25, is another relationship between v and r. This is the constraint that arises from treating the electron as a wave.

Now if the electron can act as both a particle and a wave, then both the Equation 38.25 and Equation 38.28 constraints have to be obeyed. That is, v2 as given by the Equation 38.25 particle constraint has to equal v2 of the Equation 38.28 wave constraint. Equating these gives

v2=e24πϵ0mr=n2ℏ2m2r2

We can solve this equation to find that the radius r is

rn=n24πϵ0ℏ2me2  n=1, 2, 3, … (38.29)

where we have added a subscript n to the radius r to indicate that it depends on the integer n.

The right-hand side of Equation 38.29, except for the n2, is just a collection of constants. Let’s group them all together and define the Bohr radius aB as

aB=Bohr radius≡4πϵ0 ℏ2me2=5.29×10−11 m=0.0529 nm

With this definition, Equation 38.29 for the radius of the electron’s orbit becomes

rn=n2aB  n=1, 2, 3, … (38.30)

For example, r1=0.053 nm, r2=0.212 nm, and r3=0.476 nm.

We have discovered stationary states! That is, a hydrogen atom can exist only if the radius of the electron’s orbit is one of the values given by Equation 38.30. Intermediate values of the radius, such as r=0.100 nm, cannot exist because the electron cannot set up a standing wave around the circumference. The possible orbits are quantized, with only certain orbits allowed.

The key step leading to Equation 38.30 was the requirement that the electron have wave-like properties in addition to particle-like properties. This requirement leads to quantized orbits, or what Bohr called stationary states. The integer n is thus the quantum number that numbers the various stationary states.