31.7.1 Malus’s Law

Suppose a polarized light wave of intensity I0 approaches a polarizing filter. What is the intensity of the light that passes through the filter? FIGURE 31.29 shows that an oscillating electric field can be decomposed into components parallel and perpendicular to the polarizer axis. If we call the polarizer axis the y-axis, then the incident electric field is

E⃗incident=E⊥î+E∥ ĵ=E0 sin θ î+E0 cos θ ĵ(31.43)

where θ is the angle between the incident plane of polarization and the polarizer axis.

FIGURE 31.29 An incident electric field can be decomposed into components parallel and perpendicular to a polarizer axis.

The figure illustrates the parallel and perpendicular components of an incident electric field.
FIGURE 31.29 Full Alternative Text

If the polarizer is ideal, meaning that light polarized parallel to the axis is 100% transmitted and light perpendicular to the axis is 100% blocked, then the electric field of the light transmitted by the filter is

E⃗transmitted=E∥ ĵ=E0 cos θ ĵ(31.44)

Because the intensity depends on the square of the electric field amplitude, you can see that the transmitted intensity is related to the incident intensity by

Itransmitted=I0 cos2 θ  (incident light polarized)(31.45)

This result, which was discovered experimentally in 1809, is called Malus’s law.

FIGURE 31.30a shows that Malus’s law can be demonstrated with two polarizing filters. The first, called the polarizer, is used to produce polarized light of intensity I0. The second, called the analyzer, is rotated by angle θ relative to the polarizer. As the photographs of FIGURE 31.30b show, the transmission of the analyzer is (ideally) 100% when θ=0° and steadily decreases to zero when θ=90°. Two polarizing filters with perpendicular axes, called crossed polarizers, block all the light.

FIGURE 31.30 The intensity of the transmitted light depends on the angle between the polarizing filters.

The figure illustrates the demonstration of Malus's law using an unpolarized light passing through a polarizer kept at an angle theta and an analyzer oriented vertically in front of the polarizer. A photograph of the transmission from an analyzer when the angle theta is 0 degrees. A photograph of the transmission from an analyzer when the angle theta is 45 degrees. A photograph of the transmission from an analyzer when the angle theta is 90 degrees.

Suppose the light incident on a polarizing filter is unpolarized, as is the light incident from the left on the polarizer in Figure 31.30a. The electric field of unpolarized light varies randomly through all possible values of θ. Because the average value of cos2θ is 12 , the intensity transmitted by a polarizing filter is

Itransmitted=12 I0   (incident light unpolarized)(31.46)

In other words, a polarizing filter passes 50% of unpolarized light and blocks 50%.

In polarizing sunglasses, the polymer grid is aligned horizontally (when the glasses are in the normal orientation) so that the glasses transmit vertically polarized light. Most natural light is unpolarized, so the glasses reduce the light intensity by 50%. But glare—the reflection of the sun and the skylight from roads and other horizontal surfaces—has a strong horizontal polarization. This light is almost completely blocked by the Polaroid, so the sunglasses “cut glare” without affecting the main scene you wish to see.

You can test whether your sunglasses are polarized by holding them in front of you and rotating them as you look at the glare reflecting from a horizontal surface. Polarizing sunglasses substantially reduce the glare when the glasses are “normal” but not when the glasses are 90° from normal. (You can also test them against a pair of sunglasses known to be polarizing by seeing if all light is blocked when the lenses of the two pairs are crossed.)

A photograph of sunglass with vertical polarizer.
A photograph of sunglass with horizontal polarizer.

The vertical polarizer blocks the horizontally polarized glare from the surface of the water.

CHAPTER 31 CHALLENGE EXAMPLE Light propulsion

Future space rockets might propel themselves by firing laser beams, rather than exhaust gases, out the back. The acceleration would be small, but it could continue for months or years in the vacuum of space. Consider a 1200 kg unmanned space probe powered by a 15 MW laser. After one year, how far will it have traveled and how fast will it be going?

MODEL Assume the laser efficiency is so high that it can be powered for a year with a negligible mass of fuel.

SOLVE Light waves transfer not only energy but also momentum, which is how they exert a radiation-pressure force. We found that the radiation force of a light beam of power P is

F=Pc

From Newton’s third law, the emitted light waves must exert an equal-but-opposite reaction force on the source of the light. In this case, the emitted light exerts a force of this magnitude on the space probe to which the laser is attached. This reaction force causes the probe to accelerate at

a=Fm=Pmc=15×106 W(1200 kg)(3.0×108 m/s)=4.2×10−5 m/s2

As expected, the acceleration is extremely small. But one year is a large amount of time: Δ t=3.15×107 s. After one year of acceleration,

v=a Δt=1300 m/sd=12 a(Δt)2=2.1×1010 m

The space probe will have traveled 2.1×1010 m and will be going 1300 m/s.

REVIEW Even after a year, the speed is not exceptionally fast—only about 2900 mph. But the probe will have traveled a substantial distance, about 25% of the distance to Mars.