We introduced reference frames and relative motion in Chapter 4. To remind you, FIGURE 31.2 shows two reference frames labeled A and B. You can think of these as the reference frames in which Alec and Brittney, respectively, are at rest. Frame B moves with velocity with respect to frame A. That is, an observer (Alec) at rest in A sees the origin of B (Brittney) go past with velocity . Of course, Brittney would say that Alec has velocity relative to her reference frame. We will stipulate that both reference frames are inertial reference frames, so is constant.
Figure 31.2 also shows a particle C. Experimenters in frame A measure the motion of the particle and find that its velocity relative to frame A is . At the same instant, experimenters in B find that the particle’s velocity relative to frame B is . In Chapter 4, we found that and are related by
Equation 31.1, the Galilean transformation of velocity, tells us that the velocity of the particle relative to reference frame A is its velocity relative to frame B plus (vector addition!) the velocity of frame B relative to frame A.
Suppose the particle in Figure 31.2 is accelerating. How does its acceleration , as measured in frame A, compare to the acceleration measured in frame B? We can answer this question by taking the time derivative of Equation 31.1:
The derivatives of and are the particle’s accelerations and in frames A and B, respectively. But is a constant velocity, so . Thus the Galilean transformation of acceleration is simply
Brittney and Alec may measure different positions and velocities for a particle, but they agree on its acceleration. And if they agree on its acceleration, they must, by using Newton’s second law, agree on the force acting on the particle. That is, experimenters in all inertial reference frames agree about the force acting on a particle.