29.6.2 Ampère’s Law

FIGURE 29.24 shows a wire carrying current I into the figure and the magnetic field at distance r. The magnetic field of a current-carrying wire is everywhere tangent to a circle around the wire and has the same magnitude μ0I/2πr at all points on the circle. According to Tactics Box 29.3, these conditions allow us to easily evaluate the line integral of B⃗⋅ds⃗ along a circular path around the wire. Suppose we were to integrate all the way around the circle. That is, the initial point i of the integration path and the final point f will be the same point. This would be a line integral around a closed curve, which is denoted

∮ B⃗⋅ds⃗

FIGURE 29.24 Integrating the magnetic field around a wire.

The figure illustrates the magnetic field around a circular wire.
FIGURE 29.24 Full Alternative Text

The little circle on the integral sign indicates that the integration is performed around a closed curve. The notation has changed, but the meaning has not.

Because B⃗ is tangent to the circle and of constant magnitude at every point on the circle, we can use Option 2 from Tactics Box 29.3 to write

∮ B⃗⋅ds⃗=Bl=B(2πr) (29.13)

where, in this case, the path length l is the circumference 2πr of the circle. The magnetic field strength of a current-carrying wire is B=μ0I/2πr, thus

∮ B⃗⋅ds⃗=μ0I (29.14)

The interesting result is that the line integral of B⃗⋅ds⃗ around the current-carrying wire is independent of the radius of the circle. Any circle, from one touching the wire to one far away, would give the same result. The integral depends only on the amount of current passing through the circle that we integrated around.

This is reminiscent of Gauss’s law. In our investigation of Gauss’s law, we started with the observation that the electric flux Φe through a sphere surrounding a point charge depends only on the amount of charge inside, not on the radius of the sphere. After examining several cases, we concluded that the shape of the surface wasn’t relevant. The electric flux through any closed surface enclosing total charge Qin turned out to be Φe=Qin/ϵ0.

Although we’ll skip the details, the same type of reasoning that we used to prove Gauss’s law shows that the result of Equation 29.14

Thus whenever total current Ithrough passes through an area bounded by a closed curve, the line integral of the magnetic field around the curve is

∮ B⃗⋅ds⃗=μ0Ithrough (29.15)

This result for the magnetic field is known as Ampère’s law.

To make practical use of Ampère’s law, we need to determine which currents are positive and which are negative. The right-hand rule is once again the proper tool. If you curl your right fingers around the closed path in the direction in which you are going to integrate, then any current passing though the bounded area in the direction of your thumb is a positive current. Any current in the opposite direction is a negative current. In FIGURE 29.25, for example, currents I2 and I4 are positive, I3 is negative. Thus Ithrough=I2−I3+I4.

FIGURE 29.25 Using Ampère’s law.

The figure illustrates Ampere’s law.
FIGURE 29.25 Full Alternative Text

NOTE   The integration path of Ampère’s law is a mathematical curve through space. It does not have to match a physical surface or boundary, although it could if we want it to.

In one sense, Ampère’s law doesn’t tell us anything new. After all, we derived Ampère’s law from the Biot-Savart law. But in another sense, Ampère’s law is more important than the Biot-Savart law because it states a very general property about magnetic fields. We will use Ampère’s law to find the magnetic fields of some important current distributions that have a high degree of symmetry.

EXAMPLE 29.8 The magnetic field inside a current-carrying wire

A wire of radius R carries current I. Find the magnetic field inside the wire at distance r<R from the axis.

MODEL Assume the current density is uniform over the cross section of the wire.

VISUALIZE FIGURE 29.26 shows a cross section through the wire. The wire has cylindrical symmetry, with all the charges moving parallel to the wire, so the magnetic field must be tangent to circles that are concentric with the wire. We don’t know how the strength of the magnetic field depends on the distance from the center—that’s what we’re going to find—but the symmetry of the situation dictates the shape of the magnetic field.

FIGURE 29.26 Using Ampère’s law inside a current-carrying wire.

The figure illustrates the Ampere’s law inside a current-carrying wire.

SOLVE To find the field strength at radius r, we draw a circle of radius r. The amount of current passing through this circle is

Ithrough=JAcircle=πr2J

where J is the current density. Our assumption of a uniform current density allows us to use the full current I passing through a wire of radius R to find that

J=IA=IπR2

Thus the current through the circle of radius r is

Ithrough=r2R2I

Let’s integrate B⃗⋅d s⃗ around the circumference of this circle. According to Ampère’s law,

∮ B⃗⋅d s⃗=μ0Ithrough=μ0r2R2I

We know from the symmetry of the wire that B⃗ is everywhere tangent to the circle and has the same magnitude at all points on the circle. Consequently, the line integral of B⃗⋅d s⃗ around the circle can be evaluated using Option 2 of Tactics Box 29.3:

∮ B⃗⋅d s⃗=Bl=2πrB

where l=2πr is the path length. If we substitute this expression into Ampère’s law, we find that

2πrB=μ0r2R2I

Solving for B, we find that the magnetic field strength at radius r inside a current-carrying wire is

B=μ0I2πR2r

REVIEW The magnetic field inside a wire increases linearly with distance from the center until, at the surface of the wire, B=μ0I/2πR matches our earlier solution for the magnetic field outside a current-carrying wire. This agreement at r=R gives us confidence in our result. The magnetic field strength both inside and outside the wire is shown graphically in FIGURE 29.27.

FIGURE 29.27 Graphical representation of the magnetic field of a current-carrying wire.

The figure illustrates a magnetic field versus distance graph.