Problems of interacting objects can be solved with a few modifications to the problem-solving strategy we developed in 《 SECTION 6.2.
MODEL Identify which objects are part of the system and which are part of the environment. Make simplifying assumptions.
VISUALIZE Draw a pictorial representation.
Show important points in the motion with a sketch. You may want to give each object a separate coordinate system. Define symbols, list acceleration constraints, and identify what the problem is trying to find.
Draw an interaction diagram to identify the forces on each object and all action/reaction pairs.
Draw a separate free-body diagram for each object showing only the forces acting on that object, not forces exerted by the object. Connect the force vectors of action/reaction pairs with dashed lines.
SOLVE Use Newton’s second and third laws.
Write the equations of Newton’s second law for each object, using the force information from the free-body diagrams.
Equate the magnitudes of action/reaction pairs.
Include the acceleration constraints, the friction model, and other quantitative information relevant to the problem.
Solve for the acceleration, then use kinematics to find velocities and positions.
REVIEW Check that your result has the correct units and significant figures, is reasonable, and answers the question.
You might be puzzled that the Solve step calls for the use of the third law to equate just the magnitudes of action/reaction forces. What about the “opposite in direction” part of the third law? You have already used it! Your free-body diagrams should show the two members of an action/reaction pair to be opposite in direction, and that information will have been utilized in writing the second-law equations. Because the directional information has already been used, all that is left is the magnitude information.
You and a friend have just loaded a 200 kg crate filled with priceless art objects into the back of a 2000 kg truck. As you press down on the accelerator, force propels the truck forward. To keep things simple, call this just . What is the maximum magnitude can have without the crate sliding? The static and kinetic coefficients of friction between the crate and the bed of the truck are 0.80 and 0.30. Rolling friction of the truck is negligible.
MODEL The crate and the truck are separate objects that form the system. We’ll model them as particles. The earth and the road surface are part of the environment.
VISUALIZE The sketch in FIGURE 7.16 establishes a coordinate system, lists the known information, and—new to problems of interacting objects—identifies the acceleration constraint. As long as the crate doesn’t slip, it must accelerate with the truck. Both accelerations are in the positive x-direction, so the acceleration constraint in this problem is .
The interaction diagram of Figure 7.16 shows the crate interacting twice with the truck—a friction force parallel to the surface of the truck bed and a normal force perpendicular to this surface. The truck interacts similarly with the road surface, but notice that the crate does not interact with the ground; there’s no contact between them. The two interactions within the system are each an action/reaction pair, so this is a total of four forces. You can also see four external forces crossing the system boundary, so the free-body diagrams should show a total of eight forces.
Finally, the interaction information is transferred to the free-body diagrams, where we see friction between the crate and truck as an action/reaction pair and the normal forces (the truck pushes up on the crate, the crate pushes down on the truck) as another action/reaction pair. It’s easy to overlook forces such as , but you won’t make this mistake if you first identify action/reaction pairs on an interaction diagram. Note that and are static friction forces because they are forces that prevent slipping; force must point forward to prevent the crate from sliding out the back of the truck.
SOLVE Now we’re ready to write Newton’s second law. For the crate:
For the truck:
Be sure you agree with all the signs, which are based on the free-body diagrams. The net force in the y-direction is zero because there’s no motion in the y-direction. It may seem like a lot of effort to write all the subscripts, but it is very important in problems with more than one object.
Notice that we’ve already used the acceleration constraint . Another important piece of information is Newton’s third law, which tells us that and . Finally, we know that the maximum value of will occur when the static friction on the crate reaches its maximum value:
The friction depends on the normal force on the crate, not the normal force on the truck.
Now we can assemble all the pieces. From the y-equation of the crate, . Thus
Using this in the x-equation of the crate, we find that the acceleration is
This is the crate’s maximum acceleration without slipping. Now use this acceleration and the fact that in the x-equation of the truck to find
Solving for , we find the maximum propulsion without the crate sliding is
REVIEW This is a hard result to assess. Few of us have any intuition about the size of forces that propel cars and trucks. Even so, the fact that the forward force on the truck is a significant fraction of the combined weight of the truck and the crate seems plausible. We might have been suspicious if had been only a tiny fraction of the weight or much greater than the weight.
As you can see, there are many equations and many pieces of information to keep track of when solving a problem of interacting objects. These problems are not inherently harder than the problems you learned to solve in Chapter 6, but they do require a high level of organization. Using the systematic approach of the problem-solving strategy will help you solve similar problems successfully.